“Anarchism” from Encyclopedia of Religion and Nature, by John Clark
Almost all the major European classical anarchist theorists opposed religion and defended a secularist, scientific and sometimes positivistic view of nature against what they saw as religious obscurantism and other-worldliness. Max Stirner (18061856), the major individualist anarchist theorist, dismissed religion as a belief in illusory spooks that undermined the individuality and self-determination of the individual. Pierre-Joseph Proudhon (18091865), the first important social anarchist theorist, stated that the concept of God was contradictory to rational thought and to human freedom, and that social progress is proportional to the degree to which the concept is eliminated. The anarchist anti-religious viewpoint is perhaps most widely associated with political theorist and revolutionary Mikhail Bakunin (18131876), who proclaimed, I reverse the phrase of Voltaire, and say that, if God really existed, it would be necessary to abolish him (Bakunin 1970: 7980).
The second great ancient Taoist philosopher, Chuang Tzu, has sometimes been seen as even more radically anarchistic than Lao Tzu and equally ecological in outlook. Chuang Tzu warned against the impulse to eliminate chaos and impose order on the world, which in his view leads ultimately to great destruction. He took a perspectivist position on knowledge and truth, and emphasized, often through humorous or ironic anecdotes, the fact that each being has its own good and perceives reality from its own ultimately incomparable point of view. He rejected human-centered views of reality and the tendency to project human meanings and values onto the natural world. Though the specifically political implications of Chuang Tzus thought are far from clear, his Daoism has been interpreted as one of the most consistently anarchistic critiques of the domination of humanity and nature and of the egocentric and anthropocentric mentality that underlies domination.
Although Gandhi did not absolutely reject all participation in the existing state, he rejected the state as a legitimate form of social organization, advocated its eventual elimination, and strongly opposed its increasing power. He warned against looking to the state to reduce exploitation, arguing that its concentrated power and vast coercive force necessarily does great harm and destroys individuality. In place of the centralized state, he proposed village autonomy or self-government, community self-reliance, and local production based on human-scale technologies, ideas that have been enormously influential on twentieth-century eco-anarchism. Gandhi was also a critic of Western medicine, which he saw as dependent on concentrated wealth and sophisticated technologies, and advocated instead nature cure in which the cheapest, simplest and most accessible treatments are used.
Among contemporary thinkers, the celebrated poet and essayist Gary Snyder has probably had the greatest influence in linking anarchism, spirituality and nature. He has also been a major influence on the contemporary ecology movement in showing the ecological implications of Buddhist, Daoist and indigenous traditions. Snyder has connected the concepts of the wild, wild nature and wilderness with the Tao of ancient Chinese philosophy and the dharma of Buddhism. For Snyder, the concept of the wild implies a freedom and spontaneity that are found not only in undomesticated nature, but also in the imagination of the poet and in the mind of the spiritually attuned person. He expresses the anarchic nature of the Zen mind in his statement: the power of no-power; this is in the practice of Zen (Snyder 1980: 4).
Similar themes are developed by David Watson, a leading contemporary critic of the technological mega-machine. Watson contends in Against the Megamachine that in modern societies an aura of sacredness is concentrated in the ego, in the system of technology, and in economic and political power, whereas primal societies have seen the sacred as pervading the self, the community and the world of nature. Primal spirituality was, he argues, an integral part of a system of egalitarian, libertarian and ecological social values. Furthermore, the participating consciousness of primal peoples conceives of humans as inseparable from larger natural and transhuman realities. Thus, primal peoples have had an anarchistic, non-hierarchical view of both society and nature that constitutes a powerful critique of modern industrial society and offers inspiration for future non-dominating ecological communities.
There has also been considerable theoretical discussion of anarchism, nature and spirituality in the context of debates within social ecology. Such well-known exponents of social ecology as Murray Bookchin and Janet Biehl have attacked spiritual ecologies as forms of irrational mysticism that often produce social passivity and sometimes are linked to reactionary or fascist politics. On the other hand, proponents of the value of spiritual ecologies (such as David Watson, John Clark and Peter Marshall) have argued for the importance to an anarchist social ecology of spiritual values that are ecological, holistic, communitarian and socially emancipatory. It has been argued that some social ecologists have uncritically adopted a modernist, Promethean, and naively rationalistic view of the self and its relationship to the world, and that spiritual ecologies derived from Asian philosophies and indigenous worldviews, among other sources, can contribute to a more critical, dialectical, and implicitly anarchistic view of selfhood and the place of humanity in nature.
Latest from Theory
Max Stirner’s Philosophy Is Actually Worth Reading
Newly translated article by German socialist Hermann Duncker argues, Stirner’s philosophy of self-liberation has important lessons for the working-class movement.
Life Under the Jolly Roger- Gabriel Kuhn talks with Tasos Sagris
Over the last couple of decades an ideological battle has raged over the political legacy and cultural symbolism of the “golden age” pirates who
Girl Culture Panic & the Failures of Feminism- Raechel Anne Jolie
If the thinkpieces that the algorithm put in my path in the last month of 2023 tell me anything it is that feminists are
Technopopulism: The New Logic of Democratic Politics- Interview with Carlo Invernizzi Accetti
Why is there such dissatisfaction with democracy? Why does there appear to be so little difference between political parties? And why do politicians claim
50 Χρόνια Deleuze & Guattari “Καπιταλισμός και Σχιζοφρένεια- Αντι-Οιδίπους”
Ομιλία του Χάρη Παπαχαραλάμπους στην εκδήλωση του «Κενού Δικτύου» για τα 50χρονα του Αντι-Οιδίποδα των Gille Deleuze & Felix Guattari (Θέατρο ‘Εμπρός’, Αθήνα, 22/10/2023